Prasad Vaidya has over 20 years of experience in working on energy policy, energy efficiency program development, and net-zero-energy building projects in the U.S., Korea, Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates and India. He has consulted on over 150 building projects including net-zero energy buildings and facilitating technical analysis and decision-making. In India, he has worked on the implementation of the Energy Conservation Building Code (ECBC). He led the development of the ECOnirman Whole Building Performance, an online energy simulation tool for ECBC compliance. His work in India also includes design and construction experience in passive solar design at building and urban planning scales, use of low embodied energy materials, using appropriate construction technologies, stabilized soil block and adobe construction.
Prof. Vaidya has conducted research on green building rating systems, daylighting, energy efficiency, measurement and verification, and integrated design. He has also evaluated energy conservation technology implementation, program market penetration, cost-effectiveness and ongoing performance. He has published many papers in conference proceedings and journals around the world. Mr. Vaidya is a LEED Fellow, and volunteers on committees for the US Green Building Council (USGBC). He was a member of the Technical Resources Group for the Clinton Climate Initiative. He holds a master’s degree in Architecture from the University of Minnesota and a bachelor’s degree in Architecture from Sir J J College of Architecture.
As the area chair for Building Energy Performance, Prof. Vaidya will be responsible for program development, preparing and reviewing curriculum for the program, academic leadership of the area, and mentoring faculty members in the area. He will also interface with internal and external collaborators to develop the program synergistically.
Multiplying Zero Buildings: A survey of the issues
A Net Zero Energy (NZE) Building produces as much renewable energy as it consumes over the course of a year. Behind the NZE concept is the idea that buildings can meet all their energy requirements from low-cost, locally available, nonpolluting, renewable sources. There are finer gradations for the definition of NZE, but even this basic and simple definition is enough to show that NZE involves two sides of an equation; one side deals with managing and limiting the consumption of energy, and the other deals with generating an adequate amount of renewable energy.
NZE Buildings, with very few exceptions, manage and significantly reduce energy consumption. Their design process embodies the best practices of the low energy design, with the architect playing a significant role in reducing loads, incorporating passive design approaches, and coordinating with the lighting and HVAC engineers to design super-efficient systems. NZE design is performance and data driven by necessity. Energy modeling, monitoring, and attentive building operation matter more than usual.
The NZE Building design effort is unique and different from that required for a low energy building. The amount of renewable energy that can be generated sets the budget for energy consumption. The renewable energy amount is dependent on the resources available on site. Experience on projects has shown that when a building owner and design team are committed to an NZE goal, all aspects are negotiable in the pursuit of the goal, including building use, size, budget, etc., aspects which are typically not on the table for discussion during design. Although plug load related equipment lies outside the scope of typical design, many design teams have early discussions with the owner and users about energy consumption of appliances and equipment towards reducing that end-use in NZE buildings. Such a discussion for the Packard Foundation Head Quarters building led to the change of computer terminals and the owner’s IT group created a software application to inform building users of weather conditions appropriate for natural ventilation. At the NZEB building at CEPT University in Ahmedabad, early design discussions for optimizing renewable generation, efficiency options, costs, and overall budget, led to reduction of the conditioned floor area so that a NZE solution would fit within the renewable energy budget.
Building form and size have an impact not only on its energy efficiency potential, but they also affect the envelope area for PV. The roof provides unshaded access to solar radiation. For a given building program the roof area reduces as the number of stories increase, reducing the PV potential. A technical potential study by NREL for building typologies in the USA concluded that 62% of new buildings in the commercial sector, given their location, building type, and typical form, could achieve a NZE performance using known technologies and with 50% roof coverage with PV modules. Another technical potential for California by Arup, concluded that three of the fourteen building types, i.e. Multifamily High-Rise, Large Office, and Sit Down Restaurant cannot reach NZE performance using rooftop solar PV given the nature of their loads and building configurations. Compact urban areas which support public transportation and reduce vehicular energy use also reduce the potential for solar access to rooftops. The opposite is often the case in suburban areas with lower density, where vehicular energy use is high, along with PV potential. At the community scale, NZE design becomes an interesting tradeoff between the efficiency of density of services, vehicular access, and solar access. For NZE Buildings that are occupied by tenants, a special lease similar to a green lease may be needed to ensure that the tenants enjoy the benefits of a NZEB and take responsibility for its performance.
Generating Renewable Energy
PV technology is modular and scalable and especially suited to smaller NZEB projects that do not have large tracts of land. PV panels can be added easily over time as long as space is available. They work in all climates, including cloudy regions. Solar radiation levels are reasonably predictable over the year, which makes it easier to estimate energy production from PV on a monthly and annual basis. They have a long life, and are low maintenance with no moving parts.
Wind turbines generate energy in proportion to the square of the swept area, and the cube of the wind speed. So higher wind speeds and larger blades result in more energy and smaller blades or lower speeds result in disproportionately less generation. Large utility-scale wind turbines are much more efficient and therefore more common than smaller ones at a building scale. Wind power may be more appropriate for a campus or a community scale given the current state of the technology. Wind turbines have moving parts that require regular maintenance. Mounting wind turbines on a building can result in large and complex structural loads which need to be addressed in design.
Biomass energy uses organic material from living organisms that can be replenished within a short period. Forest residue sources of biomass are wood dust, wood chips and other waste from trees and plants. Industrial biomass can be from harvested wood, switchgrass, hemp, sugarcane, bamboo, palm, eucalyptus, etc. Animal and human waste are other sources for biofuels and biogas used in rural communities for cooking, heating, and generation of electricity. Using biomass in combustion releases the same CO2 that would have been released into the atmosphere during its growth. However, the process of growing, fertilizing, harvesting, processing and transporting biomass can result in additional carbon emissions. When such lifecycle emissions are accounted for, biomass is rarely carbon neutral. It is nevertheless, a significant reduction over using fossil fuels for generating energy. Other impacts of biomass include socio- economic effects of change in land-use and production, and air and water pollution. The best biomass application requires no change in land-use, minimal agriculture production, and very little transport. This typically tends to be projects with large tracts of land away from urban settings where there is a consistent and reliable source of biomass. As opposed to solar and wind energy, biomass energy can be available 24X7. It can be effectively combined with solar power, where biomass provides the baseload power, and solar energy provides the peak power during the day.
NZE at Community Scale
A community uses energy for buildings, industrial activities, vehicles, and community-based infrastructure such as street lighting, sewage treatment, water supply, solid waste management etc. When a community is treated as an integrated system inclusive of buildings, transportation, industry, and other services, the linkages between these systems can provide unique opportunities for solutions. Some buildings could be net positive, and help balance the building types that have higher consumption of reduced solar PV capabilities. Together such a building stock can create a ZEC. CHP systems that use biomass are more economical at community scales. Biogas released from sewage and solid waste treatment can be more easily harnessed at this scale and used in a biofuel plant. Electric vehicles can act as storage devices when excess renewable energy is generated. Perhaps one of the most extensively managed resource efficient closed loop community is the Hammarby Sjöstad, in Stockholm Sweden. It was engineered such that the supply of urban waste such as solid waste, sewage and waste heat would be sufficient to operate the community.
NZE Buildings typically are typically grid-connected. When on-site generation is greater than the building load, the excess electricity is exported to the grid. Conversely, when the load is larger than the on-site generation, grid energy is imported. This arrangement allows the NZEB to use the grid as a virtual storage device and achieve energy balance over the course of the year. Without the grid, battery storage is needed making off-grid NZE buildings more expensive.
The economics of grid connected NZE buildings are affected by the way a utility company accounts for the energy exported by the building. In general there are three types of compensation for distributed generation. Net metering is a service to an electric consumer under which electricity generated locally may be used to offset electricity provided by the utility. Net metering is often priced at retail rate, and excess generation may result in compensation to the consumer if such payments are allowed by the utility. As opposed to net metering, a Feed-in tariff (FIT) is generally priced above retail. As the number of consumers opting for FIT increases, the price is likely to reduce to retail rates. FIT requires a separate additional meter to measure the energy generated. The third compensation form is a Power Purchase Agreement (PPA) which is typically priced below retail. However, in the case of solar energy, the PPA can be priced above retail since solar generation tends to coincide with the utility system peaks.
Disclaimer: Reference in this Web site to any specific commercial products, processes, or services, or the use of any trade, firm or corporation name is for the information and convenience of the site’s visitor’s, and does not constitute endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the Ministry of Power, Government of India, or Bureau of Energy Efficiency, Ministry of Power, Government of India. Additionally, the views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the Ministry of Power, Government of India, or Bureau of Energy Efficiency, Ministry of Power, Government of India, and shall not be used for advertising or product endorsement purposes.