Overview | IGBC Net Zero Energy Rating System

An Indian rating system for NZEBs

In 2018, World Green Building Council (WGBC) initiated the ā€˜Advancing Net-Zeroā€™ project which defines an ambitious target of achieving net-zero emissions by the year 2030 for all new buildings. To support this initiative, the Indian GreenĀ Building Council (IGBC) has developed the ā€˜Net-Zero Energy Ratingā€™ in association with USAID and WGBC. This rating system intends to cement the centreā€™s commitment towards energy efficiency and drive the NZE building movement in India Further, it seeks to complement the National Mission for Enhanced Energy Efficiency and the National Solar Mission. It is applicable to a wide range of typologies such as commercial, offices, schools, residential etc.

In this webinar, Dr. Shivaraj Dhaka (Counsellor at IGBC) discusses the IGBC Net Zero Energy Rating system in detail, including the program requirements, compliance approach and process of achieving the certification. The webinar also looks at the newly retrofitted IGBC building and the strategies implemented.

Dr. Dhaka starts by walking us through the requirements of the NZE rating system. It recognises the pertinence of passive measures to reduce the annual energy use of buildings to the lowest extent possible before designing RE systems to offset the demand. Further, the code provides a provision to tap on-site and/or off-site Renewable Energy (RE). The rating system consists of mandatory and voluntary requirements. This is a 100 point rating system where 75 points are alloted to energy performance and 25 points are allotted to renewable energy generation. To achieve platinum certification, projects would need to secure a minimum of 80 points. Let us understand the requirements of the NZE rating system in detail:

Energy Performance

The rating system defines two mandatory requirements i.e. energy performance and thermal comfort. Buildings which are certified under IGBC or have an energy performance index ratio (EPI ratio) of less than 1 comply with the mandatory credit. To meet the voluntary credits, buildings can opt for the simulation approach or the prescriptive method. The latter awards points under the following categories: energy efficient envelope, air-conditioning, lighting and equipment.

Renewable Energy (RE)

In the case of renewable energy credits, it is mandatory for on-site RE sources to offset 5% of the total building energy consumption. The remaining RE can be catered through an off-site source. Points are allotted based on the percentage of energy consumption met through onsite sources.

Projects certified under the rating system include CII-IGBC centre in Hyderabad; Plant 13 Godrej and Boyce in Mumbai; Globicon terminals in Mumbai; and Capgemini campus in Bangalore.

Case Study : The CII_Sohrabji Godrej Green Business Centre

Bi-Facial PV installation at CII-IGBC

ompleted in the year 2002, the IGBC centre is the first LEED Platinum rated building in India. With a built up area of 1800 sq.m, the center exemplifies sustainable performance through the thoughtful integration of passive and active measures.

IGBC has walked the talk and demonstrated the viability of retrofitting their existing facility to meet the net-zero goal. It now features a 150 kWp bi-facial photovoltaics, effective lighting technologies and a highly efficient water cooled chiller system.

To achieve higher energy efficiency standards, the center has installed two 50TR water cooled chillers with a part load efficiency of 6.58 and 100 LED fixtures with an efficacy of 132 have replaced the old lighting system. To meet the total energy consumption, on-site bi-facial panels have been installed which capture energy from both the faces of the panel, thus increasing the total energy generation.

The webinar ends with Dr.Dhaka delineating the way forward for IGBC to promote the uptake of NZEBs by closely working with prominent organisations such as WGBC, USAID and Shakti Sustainable Energy Foundation.

Ā 

This webinar was conducted on 4th July 2019.Ā 

Dr. Shivraj Dhaka | Counsellor, CII ā€“ IGBC

Dr. Shivraj serves as a counsellor in CII ā€“ IGBC. He has to his credit over 15 papers published in international journals and conferences. He is the ā€˜Young Engineers of ASHRAE Chairā€™ for the Deccan chapter. At CII, he leads the IGBC Green Data Centre, IGBC Green Factories and IGBC Existing Buildings Rating systems. Further, he provides technical support for building simulations, indoor environmental quality and HVAC for all green building rating systems.

Q1. How long do buildings need to be operational before applying for the IGBC NZEB rating program?

Buildings at the design stage or early operational stage can apply for the NZEB certification. However, the validity of the certification is only for 12 months. The performance of the building will be assessed during this period, after which the final certification will be awarded if it meets the rating system requirements.

Q2.Ā How do you define lowest energy demand for different typologies? Are they any benchmarks?

All new buildings are required to comply with the minimum standards prescribed by ECBC 2017. For demonstrating excellence in energy performance, buildings will need to comply with the Energy Performance Index Ratios (EPI ratios) as defined by IGBC NZEB Rating System.

Q3. How can a building achieve platinum rating if has demonstrated excellent demand reduction but has limited space for on-site renewable energy installation?Ā 

A building would need to secure a minimum of 80 points for achieving platinum certification. For this, the RE source would need to offset atleast 20% of the total energy consumption. Hence, it would be quite challenging for a project with limited area to achieve platinum certification.

View webinar presentation-IGBC Net Zero Rating System

Disclaimer: This website is made possible by the support of the American People through the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). The contents of this website are the sole responsibility of Environmental Design Solutions and do not necessarily reflect the views of USAID or the United States Government.