SDE4 in Singapore: Net-Zero By Design

Knowledge Centre – Passive Strategies

SDE4 in Singapore: Net Zero by Design
About
Speaker profiles
Q&A
Webinar presentation
Watch

About

The SDE4 is a new extension of the Department of Architecture in National University of Singapore. Built ground-up as a net-zero energy building-the first in Singapore- the SDE4 combines passive design, optimized active systems along with on-site solar energy generation to provide high-comfort while reducing the building’s carbon footprint. The multidisciplinary team included Serie and Multiply Architects, Surbana (MEP) and Transsolar KlimaEngineering (the energy consultants). The idea behind SDE4 was to demonstrate to the next generation of designers and architects that high-comfort needn’t be technology-driven. The webinar features one of Transsolar’s directors, Wolfgang Kessling, to discuss the building’s innovative energy optimization strategies.

Picture 011

SDE4 at National University of Singapore

Wolfgang starts by describing an NZEB as a building that doesn’t borrow energy from its neighbours or history- it generates energy on its own footprint. Using solar PV panels, a roof in Singapore can generate 260 kWh/m2 every year on an average. For a conventional building, that amounts to the energy use of a single floor! In Singapore’s largely high-rise urban environment, the way forward for meeting the net-zero energy target is then to optimize building energy consumption. In an optimized building with about 70 KWh/m2/year Energy Use Intensity (EUI), rooftop PV can support upto 4 floors.

Open facades at SDE4
The architectural concept of the SDE4 was to use open facades to allow the building to interact closely with its surroundings, tapping into breezes, biophilia and the tropical environment. The building is shaded by an oversailing roof, which is used for solar energy production.

For Singapore’s hot and humid climate, providing comfort by conventional parameters can be highly energy intensive. However, the SDE4 takes a paradigm-changing approach to thermal comfort that reduces the cooling load by nearly half.

Conventionally, thermal comfort is equated only with air temperature. However, a more holistic view of thermal comfort includes 6 parameters-air temperature as well as air speeds, relative humidity, mean radiant temperatures, clothing and activity levels. Out of these, air temperatures, air speeds, humidity and mean radiant temperatures can be controlled directly by building systems.

Further, a conventional approach considers an operative temperature of 24°C, irrespective of the season or the geography. However an adaptive comfort approach considers that occupants adapt to seasonal changes and hence indoor conditions can vary relative to the outdoors. A standard effective temperature of 27°C is perceived as comfortable in a hot and humid climate, whereas a much lower temperature would seem comfortable in a temperate climate. Adaptive comfort approach results in as much as 50% lower energy consumption!

The intensive theory backed by analysis and experimentation helped the client accept these paradigm-shifting strategies for comfort. As a result, the SDE4 incorporated a hybrid cooling system in 26% of the space, including the library, design studios, theatre and office. This system provides tempered air supply to maintain an operative temperature of 29 °C. Elevated air speeds with the help of ceiling fans help achieve the standard effective temperature to 27 °C.  No return air ducts or false ceilings are used and the air simply spills out into corridors. Windows are operable.The building accomodates two more thermal zones- labs are fully air conditioned whereas spaces like the social plaza, modelling areas and workshops are naturally ventilated. As a result, occupants are flexible to make their adaptive comfort choices.

The team also emphasized on daylight comfort along with thermal comfort. Using intensive daylight modelling and analysis, the team finally arrived at an optimized facade with low glare potential and increased spatial daylight autonomy while optimizing thermal comfort using overhangs, internal blinds and light shelves that can redirect light.

Recounting the net-zero energy framework, the first step must be taken by the clients and architects- to minimize EUI by optimizing building layout and operations along with balanced user requirements.The next step must be addressed by the MEP team by choosing energy efficient technology. Once these two key steps are in place, the final step of on-site renewable energy installation can take the building to net-zero energy.

The webinar ends on a thoughtful note with Wolfgang pointing out that majority of the future urban growth is set to occur in the hot and humid parts of Asia, triggering a sudden and large demand for cooling energy. Designing buildings for adaptive comfort can reduce this energy consumption by almost 50% and is thus clearly the way forward.

This webinar was conducted on 27 September 2019.

Speaker profiles

Wolfgang Kessling | Director, TRANSSOLAR KlimaEngineering

Wolfgang has been instrumental in spearheading the energy concepts of prominent projects such as the Cooled Conservatories at Gardens by the Bay, Singapore; Zero Energy Office Building, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia; and the Human Resources Headquarters at Novartis Basel, Switzerland.

Q&A

Q1. Was a post-occupancy survey conducted for SDE4?

Yes, there is a tremendous demand for qualified feedback beyond the design intent. The SDE4 is a living laboratory for the National University of Singapore (NUS). The NUS conducts surveys, collects data from sensors and does extensive research to understand the building performance. We can expect these findings to be published in the future.

Q2. How did you ensure the increased air velcity didn’t introduce air drafts into occupied space?

Draft is usually only in the context of air supply at low temperatures whereas in SDe4, supplied air is tempered.Further, we recommend air velocities under 1 m/s. At 1.2 m/s, you can actually observe papers flying, people shivering…In SDE4, air velocities between 0.7-0.8 m/s are maintained. The gentle supply used in SDE4 is warm enough to not result in discomfort. We also encourage occupants to move the positions of their chairs and tables around, and to switch the ceiling on or or off to feel comfortable.

Q3. Was the temperature rise due the climate change and its impact on comfort factored into the design?

The SDE4 is very resilient. One way to understand this is that even if the power fails, the embedded autonomy for daylight, fresh air supply and other paramters can keep people comfortable. Even if tempered air supply doesn’t work, ceiling fans can create comfort. A 1° C increase in temperatures can be compensated just by air movement.

Q4. Was outdoor air comfort considered for the project?

In the sense that the building is designed in the context of the beautiful vegetated surroundings. It connects the indoors and outdoors.

Q5. Can you elaborate on the instruments used in the adaptive comfort experiment at World School, that informed the SDE4’s design process.

We needed to measure the six paramters of thermal comfort- .We used sensors to monitor the directly measurable parameters-air temperatures, humidity, mean radiant temperatures, air velocities. We used our observation to determine the other two parameters that are not easy to measure- the clothing and activity levels of occupants.

Webinar presentation

View webinar presentation- SDE4 in Singapore

Watch

View the recorded webinar here